Finally, here are a few points to be made against the arguements made in the e-mail previously posted.


First, within the story we start with a story of an arguement that took place previous to the accident in which Daniel and his wife argued extensively. This event in itself is not the only apparent reason that the angel later tells him he should go to hell. He is also guilty of unforgiveness toward his wife later. While no animocity is shown between the two after the wreck, apparently Daniel still did not forgive his wife. Since this tragedy had obviously helped him to get over his anger at his wife, it seems that his problem is not that he has bitterness or malice in his heart, but that he has not physically forgiven his wife. Whether it is his heart attitude or physical action that is required for heaven is not apparent, but whichever is required is not done in time. Truly, anyone who dies in an instant of such freak accident as this, or those who end up in a coma are surely condemned to hell, seeing as there is no time to pray forgiveness prior to death.


Later, we se a very obvious time in the hospital where Daniel is praying to ask for forgiveness, and not simply just because he knows he has sin in his life, but because he apparently needs to be forgiven of sins that will keep him out of heaven. So the author starts with the view point that we are required to ask forgiveness for sins in order for them to be forgiven. Thus, we can an often do lose our salvation. This is declared to be a main point in the final passage. But this is something which the author already takes for granted as common truth.


Moving into the story from Daniel's experiance after death, we see that the angel qualifies those in heaven as humans who 1) Served God, 2) Had faith focused on Christ, 3) and lived righteously. This angel basically states that the qualifications to reach heaven are three human activities. Adherance to these actions is the basis for entering or being barred from heaven.

Interestingly, these people in heaven are "ageless and raceless." What does an ageless person look like? There is no way that a physical appearance can be described as ageless, much less by someone who has only experiances those of various and progressing age. They must have at least appeared to be in some approximate age range, or that leaves two options. Did these people appear to be prenatal or corpses? If these appeared in some way ageless, they must have appeared as being either before or after age effects human beings. Even in these stages, age has its effects.


Raceless is similar in nature to ageless, for what does a raceless person look like if everyone has a race? How can a person has no distincives in the shape of their nose or the color of their skin? This would require that they were a color dissimilar to humanity and so different in shape that they in no way appeared similar to a human. To have no similarity to any race is to have no similarity to humanity.

It is interesting to note that the worshippers acted "as if a sort of electronic device was activating them." How is it that the beautiful availability of worship of God at a closer magnitude that any previous time is not an individual expression of free will, but a mechanical almost forced sounding activity? We have seen here on earth only a small amount of worship, simply incomparable to the amount available to us when we truly see his full glory in heaven. It is hard to believe that worship can be truly magnificent if it is not personal.


In quoting Scripture, it is interesting that Luke 16:19-31 is referenced first, but later verse 31 is quite deliberately left off of the second reference. It is also interesting that father Abraham is the only distinguishable character in heaven, who apparantly does not follow the ageless or even perhaps raceless rule, seeing as his age was mostly likely older because he looked like himself, and thus he would have Jewish distinctives in appearance. It is also interesting that of all of the great leaders and men of God found in the Bible, only Abraham is distinguishable from the masses.

I don't know much about the theology of singing flowers.

Later, the angel tells him that the mansion is empty because Christ has not finished revealing the proper nature of the church, as we will see is done by the end of the trip. So were do the worshiping masses live? Do they not receive mansions? It would seem their activities have certainly earned it.

Upon entering hell, we see that people are punished by repeating actions similar to the isn in their lives. But how does God decide which sin we are responsible to repeat? Is it the sin that gets us into hell? Or is it simply the worse sin we have ever committed? But how could this be if we asked for forgiveness of that sin at some point? So it must be either the sin that we last commit or the largest sin for which we have not asked repentance. Logically, since this man would be in hell for the sins specified by the angel, this would probably be what he paid with in hell. So he would be responsible to repeatedly argue with his wife or repeately forgive her? This is all very confusing to say the least.

Later on, we read that both Christians and pastors are in hell. While it is of no doubt that pastors will be in hell, it is not simply bad terminology to call those in hell Christians, but actually a very pivotal statement. This does not mean those who are here deemed Christians are simply "churched people" who were not truly saved, but those who were once saved and lost it for lack of careful repeated repentance. It is also completely logical for the enlightened pastor to think that if he is only able to find a way out he will be able to earn back his salvation. This idea runs parallel with the theology of this entire composition.

And here we come to the point where the author takes this theology that has already proven itself to be flawed and takes it one step further. The angel tells Daniel that he would end up in hell because "the prayers he prayed as he was dying in the hospital were of no effect, because he refused to forgive his wife even when she attempted to reconcile on the morning of his fatal accident." Thus, we see that this man would be in hell not because he did not accept Christ's redeeming payment for sin, but because of this lack of proper action. If we simplify the act of unforgiveness to what it ultimately is, we can simply define it as sin. Thus, the simplified statement is that the actions which he took to save himself before death (aka prayers to be re-saved) were not valid because he had committed a sin that he had not atoned for in a proper required manner. This is important because it builds off of the assunmption that one must properly react to his sin to be forgiven, and says that one must also specifically react to the action of unforgiveness, because it has been overlooked and holds sway over any other sin.

Immediately following, the angel tells that God has chosen to send him back to earth to reveal this new revelation to the church. This is were we can see a purposeful neglect of verse 31 in referencing the same passage that was earlier referenced in the story. It seems that the author would at least be consistent enough to remember to leave this verse off the first time as well, or readers may realize obvious discepencies between the text and the implications drawn. We will come back to this later.

Just before coming back to life, Daniel is told that he will "spread the gospel of salvation" through what he now knows from this special revelation. So we can see that apparently the church did not have sufficient revelation to correctly follow God and be saved.

His finishes by making the point that we cannot gain our salvation without acting holy, we are not always saved once we are originally saved, and that we must always be ready for God to come or we will end up in hell.

As a small side note, it is interesting to notice that as a point of validity of this miracle is that Reinhard Bonnke does not need the publicity. This is flawed for two reasons. First, the validity of whether an event did or did not happen is not changed by whether it is good for someone involved. It makes no sense to try to prove something happened by saying someone else did not know it. Secondly, Reinhard Bonnke is the one whose ministry produced a documentary of these events, so it is obvious that he does wish to promote this event. While he is not very instrumental in the story itself, the angel basically promotes him as one of the two men who God is sending to proclaim the true gospel. This is a pretty good testamony for him, and he has been sure to heavily promote this testamony since its occurance.

Next, let us look more deeply into the serious biblical flaws and scriptural twisting that takes place. First, we can see that the author uses the exact scriptural reference on Abraham that he will later use to illustrate his point of God's sending a man back to earth. For some unexplainable reason, the author does not leave off the final verse the first time he uses this reference , but is required to the second time because to keep it would be suicide for his point. In the final verse Abraham replies to the man in hell's request of a messenger to those on earth by saying "If they do not hear Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be convinced if someone should rise from the dead." This proves the exact opposite of what this story depicts. We can assume that Abraham is saying that if people will not listen to the law within the Old Testament (this was written by Moses and the Prophets, and the only way people could listen to them) then they will not listen to a man returned from the dead. Thus, he is either saying that God will not send a man back, or at least that it would be completely ineffective. Thus, God either did not send a man back, or He did so knowing it would be completely ineffective. However, the David Servant assumes from this passage that "a man would come back from the dead and warn people fo hell." This is simply unbiblical.

He likewise ignores the context of 2 Peter 3:12 by saying that it describes Jesus as being delayed because he is waiting for Christians to be ready for him. The NASB version of 2 Peter 3:11-12 reads, "since all these things are to be destroyed in this way, what sort of people aught you to be in holy conduct and godliness, looking for and hastening the coming of the day of God, on account of which the heavens will be destroyed by burning, and the elements will melt with intense heat!" So we can see from this small snipet that, regardless of the context of the passage, those waiting here are the Christians, not Jesus! It says men are waiting for God, not God waiting for men.

After looking at Matthew 5:21-22, we can assume that if this is to be taken literally then we should also remove our eyes and limbs when they cause us to stumble, as well as hating our families to truly love God.

The final scriptural reference is so long that it covers Jesus statements on numerous issues, and the statements from the beginning of the passage are blended with those from the end of the passage, making a new context of the authors own preference. We could all write our own, completely individualized gospel stories and Bibles if we simply follow this interesting principle.

As one final and concluding statement, we can see that in every are, the author much bend the Bible to make it fit his assumptions, which he carries to the Bible, instead of finding them there. It is most interesting that all of the main points the author wishes to prove are perfectly paralleled in the miracle. Also, the gospel itself is never mentioned, and one begins to wonder if the author has ever even heard story about a man on a cross, since it is a rather intricate part of the overall message in the New Testament (OT as well.) Here we can come to a few conclusions. First, the views that the man expresses are contrary to the Biblical text. He twists the few scriptures he can use, so their is obviously no text to back him up. Second, we have numerous passages that teach us that God had redeemed us, and we do not redeem ourselves. I am sure a few come to mind immediately. These ideas destroy the gospel message, for if we must constantly be saved over and over, what work did this useless savior truly accomplish? Obviously he was not atonement in and of himself if we must add to his gift daily from ourselves. And we can also see that this miracle is fake. While I know well that God has the power to do any miracle he wishes, and it is not rediculous to assume he may do something similar, we can know that since the entire revelation of this miracle is false, it was either demonic or stages in some way.

Jesus Christ is great because he is our only hope, there is nothing in us that can save us. We do not earn it. While it is great to strive for holiness, and the Bible requires that Christians would do this if they are to live for God, it is in no way whatsoever connected with salvation. The author says at one point "if this story is all a hoax, the result of this hoax is real holiness." Sadly, this story is on some plain a hoax, and it does not produce real holiness. True holiness is not a mindset of reaching again and again to gain our salvation, but realizing that Christ has done and become everything we could ever need, and we should be see that daily and strive to be like Christ!

Oh my God...

That is all I can think...

I was running a simple errand, and as I returned, I jumped out of this beat up old van, and glanced to the sky. I was stopped dead in my tracks. I had forgotten how easy it is to see so many solar systems and galaxies out here in the barren wilderness. Literally enough stars so that parts of the sky just simply looked whiter than others. No matter how many huge and distant stars Loui can show me, I am always more awe struck by the real thing, even if it is much more simple in appearance than through a telescope. God is so huge. He made such huge things. We are His objects of affection. I think it is amazing to realize that all things were once intrinsicly good. God said it is good. And thats what it was. Why else do we stop to look over the heavens, or stare into microscopes, or have aquariums and zoos, or spend our vacations at the ocean front or in the mountains? We are lucky enough to come to times, like this one, were we are simply stopped by the beauty of God's ideas. And if we are lucky, we can realize these things are from God, and be lead to humbly say.... oh my God.

Finally, the much anticipated entry...

So let me set up a little introdution. A friend on mine recently recieved this story via e-mail, and we were both horrified to realize that this is apparently a prominent view in some areas of mainstream Christianity. After recently studying and critiquing heresies and the apologies against them in the early church (100-600 AD), it was quite shocking to have a first encounter with similar modern thought. Though this is a bit long, I would highly encourage you to read it above anything else on this blog. There is a definite need for apologetics in todays society, for it can be used within the church as well as outside the church in showing people the truth that is so closly courted by such dark and twisted theology.

It is mostly likely that my next chance to blog again will by a few quick insights into the obvious flaws of this story and its theology, as well as the extreme importance of realizing what it is.

P.S. The only liberty I have taken in copying this material is to insert paragraph breaks since ther were none when I copied it here.

Please read on....


"The Resurrection of Pastor Daniel Ekechukwu"
Soon after it occurred in December of 2001, I heard the report of Nigerian pastor Daniel Ekechukwu's resurrection via e-mail from my friend, pastor David K. Aboderin, of Lagos, Nigeria. I also heard about this miracle from my friend Brent Regis, son-in-law of Reinhard Bonnke. Bonnke had been preaching at the church where Ekechukwu was resurrected a short time before it occurred. Brent told me at that time some of the details of pastor Ekechukwu's experience in hell. Some months after that, I also watched the video documentary of that miracle produced by Christ for all Nations, which focused primarily on the miracle of the resurrection. I wanted to learn more about the incident. Since I was scheduled to spend the first two weeks of September, 2002 teaching at three pastors' conferences in Nigeria, I told David Aboderin that if it would be possible, I would like to meet pastor Ekechukwu, and I prayed that the Lord would make it possible. I learned that pastor Ekechukwu was from a village called Amaimo, Imo State, and that he was pastoring a church in the city of Onitsha, Anambra State, called Power Chapel Evangelical Church. Onitsha was about a three-hour drive from where our final conference would be held, in the eastern Nigerian city of Umahia. So I asked the pastors at that conference if any of them knew how we could find pastor Ekechukwu. One young man raised his hand and told me that he had a friend who had a friend who personally knew pastor Ekechukwu. However, we also learned that pastor Ekechukwu was very difficult to meet, as he is in great demand. To make a long story short, we eventually learned that pastor Ekechukwu was temporarily staying at a hotel just five minutes from David Aboderin's home in Lagos, where I would be lodging during my final three days in Nigeria. We were also given the opportunity to meet him. So in a country of 130 million people, and in a city of 12 million, the man I wanted to meet was lodging just five minutes away from me! It was either great coincidence or wonderful providence. I was given the favor of personally meeting with Daniel Ekechukwu twice during those three days and also talking with several people on his ministry staff who were very familiar with his story.
The following report has been compiled from several sources:
(1) from pastor Daniel Ekechukwu himself by means of personal discussions>I had with him from September 12-14, 2002, while I was in Lagos, Nigeria.
(2) from his personal written testimony contained in his own self-published booklet which he gave me, titled Miracle of the 21st Century.
(3) from listening to his public testimony on September 13th at The Chapel >of Glory, Lagos, Nigeria.
(4) from the documentary video produced and sold by the ministry of Christ for all Nations, which includes the testimonies of pastor Daniel, the doctor who pronounced him dead, Daniel's wife, Daniel's father, the mortician who embalmed Daniel, and several pastors who were present at his resurrection.
(5) from a personal discussion with Ede Samuel, a long-time friend and personal assistant to pastor Daniel, who also was an eye-witness of many of the events surrounding Daniel's death and resurrection. The events described in the following report are factual to the best of my knowledge and memory. I've sent this report to a Nigerian man named Uche Chikezie, who was Daniel Ekechukwu's Public Relations Director, and he affirmed that all that I reported is true. I am persuaded that due to complications from an automobile accident, Nigerian pastor Daniel Ekechukwu physically died in the late evening of Friday, November 30th, 2001, was dead for at least 42 hours, visited heaven and hell during the time of his physical death, and was>raised from the dead between 3:50 P.M. and 5:15 P.M. on Sunday, December 2nd, 2001 in the basement of the Grace of God Mission, located in Onitsha, Nigeria. Pastor Ekechukwu's resurrection is the greatest modern miracle of which I've heard. Although some of what happened to pastor Ekechukwu is certainly extra-biblical, none of it is unbiblical. Indeed, neither the story of Daniel Ekechukwu's resurrection or the story of your salvation is found in the Bible, making them both extra-biblical, but neither should be discounted on that basis.
The Account
On Thursday, November 29th, 2001, Pastor Daniel Ekechukwu and his wife, Nneka, had a misunderstanding that degenerated into an argument that ended in her slapping him. He was very offended by this incident, to the point of not even acknowledging her attempt to reconcile the next morning. Pastor Daniel admitted that throughout the day of November 30th, he angrily thought about how he would put his wife in her place when he returned home. He would not, however, make it home that Friday. As he was driving home that evening, the brakes on his 20-year old Mercedes 230E failed as he was heading down a steep hill, and his car crashed into a concrete pillar that was built to prevent cars from going over a steep embankment. He was not wearing a seat belt (few Nigerians did in 2001, but that changed in 2003, when wearing a seat-belt become a national law), and his chest hit very forcibly against the steering wheel and its knob, apparently doing damage to his internal organs, as he was soon vomiting up blood and having difficulty breathing (not to mention that he soon lost all signs of life). Daniel was not able to remove himself from his car, but frantic on-lookers pulled him out. One bystander volunteered her car while another bystander offered to drive him to St. Charles Borromeo Hospital, not far away on the outskirts of Onitsha. Within minutes of their arrival at the hospital, a doctor began administering emergency treatment, but Daniel knew his body was not responding to it. He began praying the prayer of a man who knows he is going to die, asking God to forgive him of all his sins so that he would be ready to stand before the Lord. He also sent for his wife, Nneka, with whom he had refused to speak when he left his home earlier that day. She fainted upon hearing the news of her husband's accident and condition, but when revived was taken by a Christian neighbor to the hospital. Daniel's friend, Ede Samuel (whom I interviewed at length) was with her and essentially witnessed everything that transpired over the next three days. Upon seeing Daniel in critical condition when she arrived at St. Charles Borromeo hospital, Daniel's wife burst into tears, begging her husband not to die and leave her. The doctor admitted that there was nothing he could do to save Daniel's life (keep in mind this was a Third World hospital), and so Daniel requested that he be transferred by ambulance to Umezuruike Hospital at Owerri, where his personal doctor practiced. The Umezuruike hospital was 80 km away. Daniel's wife arranged for the ambulance against the advice of doctors at St. Charles hospital. It was on the way to Umezuruike Hospital that Daniel died. Daniel was lying in the back of the ambulance while his wife was in the front passenger seat. He began to feel that he was not going to survive, and so he called for his wife to come to him. He began to say goodbye, give her instructions about certain church and personal documents, and admonished her to take care of their sons and his church. She began sobbing greatly and amidst her tears strongly rebuked him for such negative statements. He was a man of God and should have faith, and not be speaking of dying! As she was speaking, Daniel saw two large angels (they were so large that he later wondered how they fit inside the ambulance---one was as big as the ambulance) who were completely white (even the pupils of their eyes). Daniel tried to speak to the angels, but one held his finger to his lips, motioning for his silence. The angels lifted him on either side, and Daniel realized that there were now two of himself. The angels were holding him under each arm of his spirit man (which was perfectly whole), while his broken body was lying below. Once they left the ambulance, Daniel became oblivious to the natural world. When the ambulance arrived at Umezuruike Hospital with Daniel's body, it was now late at night (Friday, November 30th), and Daniel's doctor was not there. A member of the medical staff, however, examined his body and sadly told Nneka that her husband was dead and there was nothing that could be done. Nneka refused to believe the bad report. So they drove to the Federal Medical Center in Owerri, but found no doctor there either. Finally they drove to the Eunice Clinic, and there Daniel was confirmed to be dead by Doctor Jossy Anuebunwa. There was no breathing, no heartbeat or pulse, and Daniel's pupils were dilated and fixed. The doctor said that there was nothing he could do. A death certificate was issued at 11:30 P.M., November 30, 2001. They then drove Daniel's corpse to his father's house in a nearby village, and naturally Daniel's father and other family members were heartbroken at the sight of Daniel's dead body, weeping profusely. Daniel's father instructed them to take his body to Ikeduru General Hospital Mortuary (now known as Inyishi Community Hospital mortuary) not far away. They arrived there around 1:00 A.M. on Saturday morning. The resident mortician, Mr. Darlington Manu, received the corpse and the family members departed. The primitive Nigerian mortuary where Daniel's body was taken had no cold storage facilities, and so the mortician injected embalming chemicals into Daniel's fingers and into his feet. He then prepared to fully embalm Daniel's body by cutting Daniel's inner thigh in order to insert a tube by which he could inject more embalming fluid. As he did this, he experienced a shock that pushed him away from the corpse. This did not surprise him, as he had experienced similar forces before and attributed them to occult powers. (Such things are widely practiced in Africa and highly respected by all African pastors whom I know. Africans never understand the skepticism of Americans regarding the reality of occult power.) After a second attempt and a second shock that somewhat paralyzed his right arm, he concluded that Daniel must have been a member of a powerful secret society. He assumed, however, that after some occult sacrifices and incantations the powers in the corpse would subside, and he could then complete his work. (This mortician, of course, was not a Christian, but converted after Daniel's resurrection.) So he instructed an assistant to lay Daniel's body in the rear of the mortuary where many other corpses were already laid. (Incidentally, Daniel said that people could smell the embalming chemicals coming out of his body for two weeks after his resurrection. They would hug him and hold their noses.) Around 2:00 A.M. Saturday morning, the mortician, who lived very close to the mortuary, was disturbed by songs of worship coming from inside his mortuary, which stopped as soon as approached the mortuary doorway. This occurred twice. Upon searching for the music's source in his mortuary, he noticed some kind of light emanating from the face of Daniel's corpse. This completely unnerved him. The mortician was so disturbed over what was happing that that he located Daniel's father on Saturday morning to inform him of what had been happening and to request that he remove Daniel's corpse from his mortuary. Then, on Saturday night, while she was sleeping, Daniel's wife experienced a dream in which she saw the face of her husband, and he was asking her why they had left him in the mortuary. He stated that he was not dead and that she should take him to Onitsha where German evangelist Reinhard Bonnke was preaching. She determined to do so, even though her family thought she was out of her mind. Daniel had been dead for more than 28 hours. The family finally yielded, but purchased a casket and brought funeral clothing for the mortician to dress Daniel. Rigor mortis had fully set in by this time. An ambulance was hired on Sunday morning, December 2nd, and the casket that contained Daniel's body was taken to Grace of God Mission (a large church) in Onitsha, about one and half hours away, where evangelist Reinhard Bonnke was preaching at an afternoon church dedication service. They arrived at the church around 1:00 P.M. The church grounds were being protected by swarms of federal, state and local security guards for the sake of Reinhard Bonnke, who has received many death threats, and who is hated by Muslims all over Africa. (Not to mention the fact that the World Trade Center had been destroyed by Muslim hijackers just weeks before.) For this reason, the security guards would not allow the casket to be brought onto church grounds, thinking it might actually contain explosives. Daniel's wife loudly pleaded with them, and opened the casket to show them her dead husband, which resulted in their mocking and even flogging her because of her persistence to gain entrance. She caused such a disturbance that the senior pastor was notified, and his son instructed that Daniel's wife be permitted to bring his body to the church without the casket, and that it be placed in the basement. Daniel's body was laid there on two tables pushed together in a Sunday School room. Some believers gathered around Daniel's body and prayed while Reinhard Bonnke, who knew nothing of the dead body in the basement, preached and prayed. Eventually, it was noticed that Daniel's corpse twitched, and then irregular breathing started. (By this time, Reinhard Bonnke had left the premises entirely.) The attendant believers began praying fervently, and because his body was stiff and cold, they began massaging his neck, arms and legs. When those in the sanctuary got word that a dead man below was coming back to life, the basement room was soon jammed with people. Suddenly Daniel sneezed and arose with a jump. It was somewhere between 3:50 and 5:15 PM on Sunday afternoon. Daniel had died Friday night around 10:00 PM. He slowly became fully coherent over the next few hours.
Do you doubt this account? A report on the web site of Christ for all Nations declares: Here are some hard facts that won't go away. For two days Daniel did not breathe, his heart had stopped beating. It was in a hot climate, not suspended animation in an ice chamber. He had been injected with a harsh chemical to keep back mortification. As a corpse he was carted around for hours, pulled about, and lay in an airless narrow coffin for hours. He should have had severe brain damage, but he is alive now without any ill effects. This is no unsupported claim of bringing someone to life privately, as in a house. Here was a public event, an open demonstration of revival from death. If anyone has to be named, it is Nneka. Her incurable faith alone prevented Daniel's burial simply to bring him where she was convinced God could bring him back to life. She regarded Reinhard Bonnke as a man of God and that in the atmosphere of faith where he ministered this miracle was possible. The faith of Nneka dictated the whole event and her faith was honored. By whom? Who honored her faith? If not God, who else? I would add to this defense that if the incident was a hoax, I doubt that pastor Ekechukwu would have invented the story of what happened to him when he was escorted to hell, which I will relate next. Pastor Daniel's message is now one of repentance to the church, to prepare the church to stand before Jesus, and many have indeed repented after hearing his testimony. If his story is all a hoax, the result of this hoax is real holiness. Finally, the ministry of Reinhard Bonnke certainly needs no promotional hoax, as his Nigerian crusades are already attended by millions. He in fact states that he had nothing to do with the miracle, and wasn't aware of the dead body in the basement of the church where he was preaching.
As amazing as the story of his death and resurrection is, what Daniel experienced after his death is even more amazing. To him, what he experienced between his death and resurrection could have taken only fifteen minutes, even though he was physically dead for almost two days. After he was lifted from his body by the two angels in the ambulance, he soon found himself momentarily alone, but was soon joined by a different angel. Daniel stated that if he was confused about something that he saw or experienced, or if he had a question in his mind, this angel immediately gave him the answer. This angel first told him that they were going to Paradise. There was no time expended in getting anywhere the angel took him. As soon as the angel said they were going to Paradise, they were there. Daniel stood with the angel and watched a multitude of worshipping people who were dressed in sparkling white garments. He immediately thought they were angels, but the escorting angel told him that they were human beings who, "while they lived on earth, served God and had their faith focused on Christ Jesus and lived righteously." These people were all ageless and raceless. That is, none appeared to be young or middle-aged or elderly, and none had any racial distinctives in their appearance. All were focused on a very bright light above them, and all worshipped in perfect unison. They would all lift their hands at once and bow at once "as if a sort of electronic device was activating them." Daniel did notice one man who looked elderly among the multitude, and the thought occurred to him that perhaps that man was God, but the escorting angel immediately corrected him. The man was father Abraham. (Read Luke 16:19-31 for a story Jesus told that speaks of Abraham in the afterlife.) Daniel longed to join the worshippers, but the angel told him that there were other things Daniel needed to see. He told Daniel they would next go to see Jesus' promise to His followers, the mansion He had prepared for those whom "He would find righteous on the last day." Immediately they were there. Daniel said there is no earthly way to describe what he saw. The mansion had no apparent end to its height or width. It continually moved, and each room also revolved in some manner. It was made of something that was transparent like glass, and the floors appear to be made of light. Daniel didn't see anybody in the great mansion, but heard beautiful singing. Wondering where the music was coming from, the angel immediately pointed him to the many flowers around the mansion. When Daniel looked at them more closely, they were moving and swaying and singing praise to God! The angel told Daniel, "The mansion is ready but the saints of God are not. Jesus is being delayed because Christians in the church are not ready yet." (This is entirely scriptural; see 2 Pet. 3:12.)
Next, the angel took Daniel to hell, and they stood at the gate. When the angel lifted his hand and let it fall again, the gate opened, and Daniel could immediately hear the awful sounds of people screaming and weeping, but everything in hell was in total blackness. Then a bright light shone from the angel, and Daniel could see many groups of people in anguish. He told me of several specific groups that went through endless cycles of torment, held captive to the same sins they practiced on earth. One group consisted of people who would eat their own flesh and then vomit it out onto the ground, at which time the vomit would fly back onto their bodies and turn back into flesh that they would eat again. The angel told Daniel these people were those who had eaten human flesh as an occult practice. (Such things occur in Africa all the time.) Another group, who had stolen land from others while on earth, endlessly dug rock-hard ground with their bare hands. As I heard Daniel relate this scene, I couldn't help but thinking of how many times Scripture declares that God will repay every person according to his or her deeds, and also promises that everyone will reap precisely what they have sown. I remembered the story Jesus told of Lazarus and the rich man. In the afterlife, their roles were exactly reversed. The rich man longed for a drip of water from Lazarus just as Lazarus had previously longed for a crumb from the rich man's table. Pastor Daniel also saw the former military dictator of Nigeria. He saw a Christian who had dabbled in occult practices and fallen away from the Lord, and a pastor who had embezzled money from his own church and also lied about it. The former pastor pleaded that he would return the money if Daniel could help him escape hell. Although there were different kinds of tortures, all of the people in hell writhed in agony under an unseen force that would wrench them repeatedly. All of them were shouting, wailing and gnashing their teeth. Pastor Daniel told me that if every Christian could see what he saw, there would be no need to preach the gospel, as every Christian would become the gospel. The most surprising thing is what happened next. The escorting angel told pastor Daniel, "If your record is to be called here, you will in no doubt be thrown into hell." Pastor Daniel immediately defended himself saying, "I am a man of God! I serve Him with all my heart!" But a Bible appeared in the angel's hand, and it was opened to Matthew 5 where Jesus warned that if one calls his brother a fool he is guilty enough to go into the hell of fire (see >Matt.>5:21-22). Pastor Daniel knew he was guilty for the angry words he had spoken to his wife. The angel also reminded him that Jesus promised that God will not forgive our sins if we do not forgive others (see Matt. 6:14-15), because we will reap what we have sown. Only those who are merciful will obtain mercy(Matt>5:7). The angel told Daniel that the prayers he prayed as he was dying in the hospital were of no effect, because he refused to forgive his wife even when she attempted to reconcile on the morning of his fatal accident. Pastor Daniel wept at this revelation, but the angel told him not to cry, because God was going to send him back to the earth to grant the rich man's request (see Luke 16:27-30). A man would come back from the dead and warn people of hell. The angel said that Daniel's resurrection would serve as a sign and be the last warning for this generation. Finally, pastor Daniel was led to the top of a mountain, at which there was a large hole full of darkness. There the escorting angel handed Daniel to a man standing there whom he did not recognize at first, but soon realized it was German evangelist Reinhard Bonnke. The angel told Daniel that man would help him spread the gospel of salvation. Both Daniel and Rev. Bonnke fell into the hole, and that is when pastor Daniel jumped up from the table where he lay at the Grace of God mission. He was back in his body after having been dead for at least 42 hours, almost two full days.
As you may imagine, pastor Daniel greatly emphasizes in his preaching the need to forgive those who have wronged us, lest anyone suffer the fate he almost suffered. How important it is that we obey Jesus' commandments regarding forgiveness and walking in love toward each other, as well as all the rest of His commandments. It is indeed time for the church to repent and "pursue peace with all men, and the holiness without which no one will see the Lord" (Heb.>12:14). Do not listen to false teachers who say that holiness is not essential to ultimately gain eternal life. Jesus warned that only those who do the will of His Father will enter the kingdom of heaven (see Matt. 7:21). Do not listen to teachers who say that if you are once saved you are guaranteed that you will always be saved. Jesus warned His closest disciples (see Matt. 24:1-3) of the possibility of their not being ready when He returned and being cast into hell (see Matt. 24:42-25:46). If we expect God to forgive us, we must forgive others. That is what Jesus solemnly promised. Are you ready to stand before Jesus, sincere and blameless?

By David Servant

It is such a beautiful thing to come to an understaning of the apologetic fathers of the first 6oo years after Christ. In a variety of concurrent classes, I have been learning more and more the ways in which early Christians discovered, revered, wrestled with, defended, and often died for their beliefs. It is interesting to understand the ways in which these men wrote and see that the apostle's were not unlike them in their writing. I think many people don't realize how much of the Biblical text in the New Testament is actually directed at secular thought of the time period. Much of the apostolic work was devoted to proving the validity of the gospel over the culture.
Truly, we should follow their leading and be culturally relevant and yet remain firm and outspoken in areas that clash with society. It seems that most of Christianity today either condemns society and has nothing to do with it or conforms so much that boundaries are never even created in a number of areas. Why are we not thinking through every single aspect of our lives and evaluating them through Scripture?

It's kinda funny the ads they put on here, some have nothing to do with the material on the blog and some are really thought provoking. Some of the ones that are for churches have some sketchy stuff on em, just like the e-mail I'm so eagerly awaiting to put on here. I have to say, its really eye-opening to see what peopel really truly believe about the God of the Bible.

I recently got my hands on the promotional sampler of a new book entitled The Red Letters by Tom Davis, and the chapter I was able to read is simply profound in its assesment of Christianity today. The book claims that Christianity today owes the world an apology for how little it has done to reach out and help the world in the way Christ commanded it. Here is a brief segment....

"I've discovered a new way to live. Every morning when I get out of bed, I look for Jesus. No, not because I've misplaced Him. And I'm not talking about a feeling I get during prayer, or revelation that comes to me while reading Scripture. I'm talking about finding Jesus in the eyes of real people. In the eyes of the poor, the handicapped, the oppressed, the orphan, the homeless, the AIDS victim-the abandoned and the forgotten.
Throughout Scripture, Jesus identified with teh poor in amazing ways. He was their champion, their advocate. He gave them purpose and meaning and hope. He held them in high esteem and blessed them. There is something deep and meaningful about this. In Matthew 25:40 Jesus said, 'Whenever you did one of these things to someone overlooked or ignored, that was me-you did it to me.' Was he truly saying that we will find him in the lives of the poor? This is a rich mistery."

Seems he has really hit something we don't hear much.
The book has come out since I recieved this sampler, to find out more, check out http://tomdavis.typepad.com/

I just have to say that I am so excited by the fact that I go to a school where I can learn about things like the historic philosophies surrounding politics, and from a Christian worldview! It seems today that we are so engrossed in our culture that few people have any regard for history, but it is in the history of various sciences that we see what they are really composed of. In this day and age, with so many unpresidented political situations that are new to the world in the last century, it is vital that we understand politics (and other similar studies) from an overarching view. It is impossible to gain a true understanding of politics from such a bias source as our modern political culture. It is extremely relevant to see how things have worked or failed in the past.
It is also interesting to see how political systems work or fail in other countries. Though there is some attention paid to the governing of coutries we are at odds with or siding with in conflict, as a general rule the positives and negatives of foriegn government attempts do not seem to be utilized in making better decisions here.
It is proven that American interest and involvement in politics has been decilining for years. The common man, and even the politician in seems from time to time, has no agenda that involves politics at all. This is scary.

It is easy to come to the belief that our personal position with God should be the main focus for the Christian life. We are, after all, called to be examples and live holy lives. However, I know that I personally have often come to the saddening conclusion that I am only able to sustain a holy lifestyle when I am focused on reaching others, being an example, or being a servant. These qualities seem to make it easier to to live the life God calls us to. I recently heard a guest speaker in a class say that he only wished he could recreate the dependancy on God that he had a a missionary here back in the states.
Why do we then struggle to fix ourselves instead of being outward focused? It is backwards to think that if we can fix ourselves we will be able to reach others. We know one fact to be foremost in all situations, and this is that God's glory always supersedes our humanity. There are three obvious issues: That God be glorified, that others see Christ, and that we live holy, set apart lives. All of these are directly related to one another.
However, it is proven to be a failing mindset to believe that a personal holiness will bring God's glory and show Christ to others. This is a system set for failure, because we are focusing on the least of the three, making it easiest to lose. The two greatest commandments are to love God foremost and to love others, so obviously the order in which we often approach these needs is faulty. It is healthy to purposefully glorify God even when we don't feel worthy or close to Him. Though repentance is key, we should train ourselves to unromantacize our walks with God and worship when we don't feel like it, reach out and minister when we don't feel worthy. We teach that truly loving a spouse is putting them first and doing things for their interests even when we don't feel in love or want to do it, but we treat God differently when we sin or lose sight of Him. There is no justifiable reason that we continue to beat ourselves up after God has forgiven us, but we ignore this and often stop even sooner by ignoring our sin, simply because we have false ideas of God in our mindset. Just as in any other, intrinsically lesser relationship, we should realize that our personal feelings and perceptions of our standing with God give no right to act selfishly.

Simply put, a life focused on the personal holiness in hope of achieving a servant and worship lifestyle is a life starting from a self centered, humanistic position, were we are foremost.

A life focused on serving God in every aspect and showing Him to others forgets self, and this is a truly glorious state of being.

Do not get me wrong, I am all for personal holiness, but it should come from a changed perception of the world.